| Feuil1 | Feuil2 | Feuil3 |
| USAID PERFORMANCE MONITORING | DRC COUNT= RY WORK PLAN 2007 | ||||||||||||
| USAID PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (Goals) | BENCH= MARK | = ; | BASELINE | Activity category | FY07 | RESPONSIBILITY | TASK PROGRESS - PERCENTAGES COMPLETED (percentages only) |
||||||
| Annual Target | MOV | YEAR | VALUE | NGO | PERSON | FY07 Q1= Actual | FY07 Q2 Actual | FY07 Q3 Actual | FY07 Q4 Actual | ||||
| Appropriate Indicators for LS leaders (only report on Inds f= or which you are both responsible according to the Ind Ref Sheet and have ta= sks planned to achieve the target) and the USAID Target for FY05 | Means of Verification. Offers a tangible, auditable method of verifying whether or not the target has been achieved. | Status of the targets before the interventions (should be static over three reporting years) | Standardized line-items = for USAID accounting and budgeting | Tasks= , grouped by Activity Category, that will achieve the Benchmark. Should be at a fine-level of detail. | <= /td> | <= /td> | Actual = progress for Q1, from Oct 1 to Dec 31, 2006 | Actual = progress for Q2, from Jan 1 to Mar 3= 1, 2007 | Actual = progress for Q3, from April 1 to June 30, 2007 | % and a= n optional narrative of your progress to date for this Q, from July 1 to Sept 30, 2007 | |||
| Intermediate Result 1: Natural resources manag= ed sustainably | Intermediate Result 1: Natural resources managed sustainably | ||||||||||||
| Vi | 25% | 50% | |||||||||||
| = | |||||||||||||
| Intermediate Result 2: Natural resources governance (institutions, policies, laws) strengthened | Intermediate Result 2: Natural resources governance (institutions, policies, laws) strengthened | = | |||||||||||
| INDICATOR 1:
Number of key new laws or policies for PAs, logging concessions, and CBNRM
passed or old laws and policies reformed compared with a list of recommen=
ded
or promoted reforms. USAID TARGET: FY11: = At least one law or policy promotion or reform initiated per CARPE country |
1. Implementation decrees (Mesures d'application) for the new forestry code promoted. (2) first draft of the= law on nature conservation, vetted, validated and sent to the parliament and lobbying for signature started(3) Constiute a database for laws and polic= y in natural ressources Governance (4) Lobby for the delopment of decentralisa= tion law proces | 1. Compiled report of stakeholder meetings highlighting decisions made or consensus reached regarding the implementation decrees and the draft law = on nature. | FY06 | (1) New forestry code exists without implementation decrees. (2) Law on nature conservation not adapted to the context.(3)compiled book of laws exist but no archives for all laws (4) there is no zoning policy available for the country (5) No law on decentralisation existing to supp= ort decentralisation constitutional option on forest management | Stakeholder meetings/Workshop | (1) Continue analyzing the forestry code wit= h a working group comprised of representatives of civil society, government agencies the private sector and international NGOs to draft the Implementation decrees (2) participate in national,subregional and region= al meetings on NRM | carpe FP | 25% | 50% | ||||
| 2. Compiled report of meetings held by the technical group to analize the forestry code = and draft the implementation decree | = | ||||||||||||
| Compiled report of activities and list of representants, pressbook | Training/Capacity building | Supp= ort participation of local communities in the process of the conversion of fo= rest titles by facilitating and coordinating preparation of field missions that will be implemented by environmental civil society to help local communities to designate their delegates at the Interministerial Commission that will examine, approve and/or reject forest titles. | WB, SNV= | CARPE FP | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% | |||||
| 3. Copy of implementation decree | Policy/Advocacy | Lobby the Minister for the signing of the decree | Ipalaka, Willy Bolio, Carpe FP | = | 25% | 50% | 75% | ||||||
| 4. Copy of law on nature conservation | (1) participate in technical committee meetings for the process (2) take part= in at least one interprovincial workshop on the review process (3) Convene meetings with a restricted group of stakeholders to analyse the first dra= ft of the law on nature conservation and then (4) organize a workshop with a larger group of stakeholders (government agencies, partners , donors , CO= Bs) for discussion and validation. (5) send the law to the parliament; (6) fo= llow up for its signature by the president | ICCN, GEF/PNUD | Me Mutumbe, FP, Bieme | = | 25% | 50% | 75% | ||||||
| 5. copies of laws and policies gahered in t= he Ressource center | = | Compile all laws relat= ed to forest governance and archive them in a resource center | <= /td> | PF comifac | 100% | ||||||||
| 6. Compiled report of key meetings held or press-book | Media/= Outreach/Sensitization | 1. To use communicati= on/media tools to increase CARPE visibility in forestry governance | <= /td> | FP, Dorothée | 100% | ||||||||
| &nbs= p; | = | = | = | 2. Hold an intergover= nemental meeting to discuss CARPE,s activities | WWF,WCS= ,CI,AWF | CARPE FP? Jef Dupain, Patrick,Robbert, Binogwabini,Lisa, Roy | 100% | ||||||
| &nbs= p; | &nbs= p; | = | = | = | 3. Hold a meeting with parliamentarians of the Equator Province to inform them about the CARPE Program | AWF, WWF | CARPE = FP, Lisa, Binogwabini, Jef Dupain | = | = | = | 100% | ||
| &nbs= p; | 7. D= RC COMIFAC Treaty ratified. Copies = of meeting report | = | = | Stakeh= older Meetings/Workshop | Conv= ene meetings or interact with COMIFAC and Government institutions to facilita= te the ratification of the COM= IFAC Treaty; A Project proposal is prepared by the Minister and submitted to t= he Governement team; The governement studies and approved the project and se= nd it to parliament to be ratified | = | CARPE = FP | = | = | 25% | 50% | ||
| &nbs= p; | 8. C= opy of law on decentralization and meeting reports | = | = | = | Convene a meeting with members of the Judicial and Administrative commissions of the decentralization process as well as oth= er partners to to discuss the links between the new law, new forestry code and other fore= st management issues. | WWF,WCS,CI,AWF | CARPE = FP? Jef Dupain, Patrick,Robbert, Binogwabini,Lisa, Roy | = | = | 50% | 100% | ||
| INDICATOR 2: Number of =
NGO
(and other civil society organizations) advocacy initiatives & activi=
ties
(e.g., media articles about environmental governance issues e.g. illegal
logging, bush meat poaching; NR court cases brought or complaints filed w=
ith
appropriate government agencies). USAID TARGET:= FY11: = At least one national-level initiative or activity relating to forest or biodiversity advocacy underway in each country. |
(1) Inventory of Local NGOs/CBOs and one workshop held with civil society to plan on advocacy initiatives. (2)Training needs for biodiversity & forestry advocacy assessed and at least 15 people have been trained (3)local NGO a= re granted by small grant program | 1. R= eport of NGO/CBO inventory at national and LS levels | FY06 | (1) Zero NGO/CBO advocacy initiatives. (2) Illegal logging and bush meat poaching not documented. | Data c= ollection and Assessment | Carryout an inventory= of local NGOs/CBOs at national and LS levels addressing national/local envrionmental issues | WWF,WCS,CI,AWF minus Sa= longa/WWF already completed | FP, Je= f Dupain, Binogwabini,Patrick,Robbert, Roy | = | = | 50% | 75% | |
| 2. Report of meeting with local organizatio= ns highlighting decisions reached and advocacy initiatives planned; 3. Advocacy's activities program | Stakeholder meetings/Workshop | 1.Co= nvene a meeting with at least 20 people (per LS) from local organizations to plan= on advocacy initiatives; | WWF,WC= S,CI,AWF minus Salonga/WWF already completed | FP, Jef Dupain, Binogwabini,Patrick,Robbert, Roy | 100% | ||||||||
| 4. Training needs assesment report; 5. Compaigning Program document | Training/Capacity building | 1. Assess local organizations training needs related to forestry & biodiversity advocacy; | WWF,WC= S,CI,AWF | CARPE FP? Jef Dupain, Patrick,Robbert, Binogwabini,Lisa, Roy | 100% | ||||||||
| 5. Compiled report and photos of training provided, | Provide training to meet needs identified for at least 25 % organizations or CBOs. | WWF,WCS,CI,AWF | FP, Lisa,Robbert,Jef, Inogwabini | 75% | |||||||||
| 6. Position papers related to environmental governance written by ECS | Media/Outreach/Sensitization | Assist NGOs/CBOs to lobby/advocate by using communication /m= edia tools in order to promote environmental governance issues | FP | 50% | |||||||||
| &nbs= p; | 7; r= eport | = | = | Hold a training sessi= on for parliamentaries on the challenges involve in the implementation of the foresty Code | FP | = | |||||||
| &nbs= p; | laun= ching of SGP work report, projects preselected | = | = | Launch the CARPE smal= l grants workshop, convene a Natinoal Steering Committee Meeting to analyze and pr-select projects, train beneficiaries on project management; carryout f= ield monitoring on the implementation of these projects | = | 75% | |||||||
| Intermediate Result 3: Natural Resources Monitoring Institutionalized | Intermediate Result 3: Natural Resources Monitoring Institutionalized | 100% | |||||||||||
| INDICATOR 2:
Assessment of capacity of Congo Basin (African) institutions (e.g. govern=
ment
agencies, universities and research institutions, NGOs, regional
institutions) to collect and analyze information of adequate quality for
decision-making. USAID TARGET: FY07: = At least 3 staff members of appropriate institutions receive advanced traini= ng in some aspect of forest, biodiversity, or social impacts monitoring |
Capacities of local institutions in natural resources monitoring assessed and improv= ed through: (1)Factsheets produced about the 5 WHS and dispersed to governme= nt; (2)deserving individuals nominated for the Abraham conservation Award; (3)At least = 20 people trained in Remote Sensing and GIS | 1. Report of OSFAC assessment of local institutions involved in natural resources monitoring, | FY06 | Lack of information related to local institut= ions monitoring capacities (GIS, GPS), Data are missing for landscapes | Data collection and Assessment | Complete the survey of local institutions involved in natural resources monitoring, OSFAC &the FP will help to coordinate country level information on the State of the forest | OSFAC | Paya de Marcken, FP | NA | ||||
| 3. Tabular report of training completed for= GIS and Remote Sensing; photos of training | Train at least 20 people, through the GIS lab (UNIKIN) and in collaboration with ERAIFT, from national agencies and NGOs staff | OSFAC | Paya de Marcken | 100% | |||||||||
| 4. SYGIAP (Système de Gestion Informatisé des Aires Protégées) project annual report | 100% | ||||||||||||
| 5. Fact sheets on five World Heritage Sites= | Media/Outreach/Sensitization | (1) Assist SYGIAP in the production of fact sheets on five World Heritage Sit= es (4 of which in CARPE landscapes); (2) Fact sheets dispersed to government, NGOs, bilaterals etc. | WCS | John Hart | 100% | ||||||||
| Tracking the technical capability to collect appropriate information on forest and biodiversity management and/or type= s of institutions involved, and ensure that capacity-building is focused on increasing ability to positively influence decision-making. | 6. U= pdated report on Assessment of capacity of Congo Basin inst. to collect & analyze information for adequate decision-making | = | Data c= ollection and Assessment | Cont= inue to update data collection to facilitate decision making by the Government and other stakeholders in collaboration with OSFAC | WRI | Benoit= | = | = | = | 100% | |||
| 7. Training material and reports Post-training report |
<= /td> | Traini= ng/Capavity building | (1) = Train at least 10 Government officials and/or local NGs on GIS, RS and GPS ; (2) T= rain at least four MECNEF staff on database management (forest statistics); (3) Carryout one (1) advance international training course for either local N= GO or govt staff in RS, GIS & mapping | WRI | Benoit= | = | = | = | 100% | ||||
| SPIAF GIS lab set-up under World Bank project
reinforced and data collection accelerates; |
Lab. Picture & organigram ; Unofficial logging concession Map; Reports. |
FY06 | No logging surveillance system in place and operational | Stakeholder meetings/Workshop | (1) Assess the capacity of SPIAF, notably in data collection and management under the WB project, (2) Assess th DGF (MECNEF) computerized forest statistics system | WRI | Benoit | 100% | |||||
| Data collection and Assessment | (1) = Pursue data collection on logging concession (boundaries and attributes), (2) Database initiated, (3) Remote sensing activities initiated | WRI | Benoit | <= /td> | <= /td> | 100% | |||||||
| Training/Capacity building | Train at least 10 people from SPIAF and DGF on GIS and Remote sensing, in collaboration with OSFAC | WRI | Benoit | <= /td> | <= /td> | <= /td> | 100% | <= /td> | |||||
| Media/Outreach/Sensitization | (1) Unofficial logging concession map produced, (2) Pilot database. | WRI | Benoit= | <= /td> | <= /td> | <= /td> | 100% |